Man, if you think about it, there's so many ways you could put 20% fixed income to work
Really changes the dimensions of "business models"
34
77
517
Conversation
It will change the dynamics of most trades. As a trader, whenever I take a position and lock up part of my cash flow, I will have to benchmark against the 20%. Each positions will need at least a 30% return, otherwise the risk/reward ratio isn’t worth it. Ppl don’t get it yet...
2
4
45
Actually if your principal protected position offers 20%, your crypto trades need to return at least 80-100% or more on average to justify the risk imo
In crypto for sure. Commodities/ Freight trading (which is what I do for a living) isn’t even the risk the issue. Major shipping companies have btw usd 100-500 mln in cash flow. Cash is King in this industry cause allows me to take positions that small fish can’t afford. 👇🏼
1
2
But I also need to employ my cash (keep in mind a ship costs abt 10-20k per day) Can’t keep too much of it idle, but at the same time I can’t lower my cash flow too much. would change drastically the way I handle my capital.
1
Show replies
what do you think the monetary and consumer spending implications of this would be at scale? lets assume a future where LUNA is a significant global reserve currency (:P) and Anchor saving rates are the norm.
1
Short term probably a collapse of stock mkt lol (I’m exaggerating but...unless the return justify the risk. Why taking such position ?)
*Checks math on Luna rise to $100...carry the one...confirms greater than 100% increase...continues to bet on $Luna as the risk weighted best play*
2
Is there any risk for UST on anchor?
Or is it 0% risk?
There would at least be protocol risks right?
1
Can you get voyager to allow people to withdraw there Luna to Terra Station. I’m ready to 🔒 up these holdings!
1
3
Yeah I second this notion I would love to get my Terra staked but can't move it off Voyager for some reason it's BS
1