Yes, and there are other problems with the study designs, etc. Caveat emptor.
-
-
Replying to @Meaningness
this is after being *appalled* by how your theory is being used by readers in comments on your blog.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
-
Replying to @Jayarava
I didn’t understand the tweet. Are you saying you are appalled, or that I am?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness
Me. I have had my reservations, but watching followers employing fully reified "levels" left me cold.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Jayarava
Ah. Yes, agree in some cases. I don’t have time to correct most misconceptions, and don’t consider it my job.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness @Jayarava
There are different ways of approaching the moderation of blog comments; mine is relatively hands-off.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Meaningness @Jayarava
I spend literally as much time responding 2 comments/tweet inquiries/blog-related emails as I do writing; any more wd b impossible
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Meaningness @Jayarava
I'm surprised by how much you DO reply! It encourages people to engage, which I appreciate.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
FWIW the way people "use" a theory will be helpful to them. And, why care if the theory itself is also wrong?
-
-
Replying to @ssica3003
This rather assumes that people are rational. All the evidence is against you on this.
@Meaningness1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Jayarava
diasgree. Rationality has no place in deriving emotional benefit from a psychological theory
@Meaningness1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.