Many years ago a someone called Patrick pointed out to me that in the same way women are thought of as "sex objects", men are thought of as "death objects" and it explains so much.
-
-
Replying to @ssica3003
being a sex object was also being a death object before antibiotics, men & women have the same life expectancy for most of history that we can do the stats on
1 reply 0 retweets 8 likes -
Replying to @sympathetic_opp
None the less, women’s direct purpose is sex (with death an unfortunate side effect) whereas men’s direct purpose is death (soldier / war)
2 replies 1 retweet 14 likes -
-
Replying to @sympathetic_opp
The example my friend gave was in a movie it’s fine for countless hundreds of men to die to save one woman
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
-
Replying to @sympathetic_opp
I think it translates to life too. Only men can be soldiers (risk death). Then the furore over allowing women in the military: they feared male soldiers would sacrifice themselves unneccessarily to save the female ones.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @ssica3003
the women-living-longer thing is less than a hundred years old & it will only last until widespread antibiotic resistance. if men have a historically accurate sense that women already risk themselves for cont-of-species, that's very different from men being "death objects"
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
I don’t see how differences in lifespan or that women also sometimes die relates to men being seen as death objects
-
-
Replying to @ssica3003
we talked abt this elsewhere but when men's & women's social roles normally lead to death at the same rate, it might make sense to call mem "death subjects" but its misleading to call men "death objects" as a contrast to "sex objects"
0 replies 0 retweets 1 likeThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.