but i don't really understand how to parse [further claim] either, mostly because i'm not sure what the referent for "the claim" is
-
-
Replying to @QiaochuYuan
When people say "[x] isn't a personality" they're wrong - there is personality relevant information in the action taken by the person engaging in [x] ...
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @nosilverv @QiaochuYuan
the thing that they're right about is that "[x] isn't a personality" indeed but the fact that person engaging in [x] tries to make a personality out of it is
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @nosilverv @QiaochuYuan
like "liking the office isn't a personality" - correct, but the fact that person wants to be seen as 'person who likes the office' def. is EXTREMELY telling of their personality.
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
-
Replying to @QiaochuYuan
i'm literally the catholic church except instead of using great art to impart moral lessons i use shitposting to impart sociopsychological ones
1 reply 1 retweet 4 likes -
-
-
Replying to @nosilverv @QiaochuYuan
I appreciate these clarifications. Now, where did I read this point but in the direction of how advertising works, and they used the example of Corona on the beach? To signal you're a cool, relaxed guy...
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @ssica3003 @nosilverv
is it this one from
@KevinSimler? https://meltingasphalt.com/ads-dont-work-that-way/ …1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.