MetaJess

EVERYTHING IS A PERSONALITY EXCEPT THE FACT OF THE CLAIM IS MORE RELEVANT THAN THE SPECIFIC THING BEING IMPLICITLY  CLAIMED

bro, i want to like this but i'm having trouble parsing it. it sort of could read "everything is a personality except [this thing which isn't a personality]" although that reading doesn't make much sense. i guess you intended "everything is a personality, and, [further claim]"?

but i don't really understand how to parse [further claim] either, mostly because i'm not sure what the referent for "the claim" is

When people say "[x] isn't a personality" they're wrong - there is personality relevant information in the action taken by the person engaging in [x] ...

the thing that they're right about is that "[x] isn't a personality" indeed but the fact that person engaging in [x] tries to make a personality out of it is

like "liking the office isn't a personality" - correct, but the fact that person wants to be seen as 'person who likes the office' def. is EXTREMELY telling of their personality.

aha! yes

i'm literally the catholic church except instead of using great art to impart moral lessons i use shitposting to impart sociopsychological ones