Bugs in our Most Basic Social Principles 
-
-
Debugging Freedom To be free requires having people available for projects and explorations; people to go through difficult things with; people who will build, with you, a community of new meaning. So, there’s no freedom without social capacity. Personal freedom is a phantom. /1
1 reply 1 retweet 9 likesShow this thread -
Debugging Affluence Wealth once divided "haves" from "have-nots”; but now it's an insulator & isolator. Today, the “haves” are those finding meaning: deep work, places of focus and support, capacious relationships, spiritual places. Democratize this, not affluence or comfort. /2
1 reply 0 retweets 7 likesShow this thread -
Debugging Knowledge Universities, labs, schools—engines that generate and certify experts. Unfulfilled, we seek some other knowledge. Experts at goal-accomplishment; we are clueless in living by values. We can't decide which goals to have. We need, instead, engines of wisdom! /3
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likesShow this thread -
Debugging Responsibility Cities of "good men" and "good women”. Responsible. Fulfilling contracts. Where are the men & women of integrity, discovering values & living by them? Gone. Ethics, beauty & courage grow impossible. Love is just fulfilling expectations. Work, slavery. /4
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likesShow this thread -
Debugging Justice Justice means the moral development of individuals. It requires exposure to situations of power, and to the consequences of acts. These consequences mustn’t mediated and unseen. Bankers must walk amidst the homes foreclosed; technologists, among their users. /5
2 replies 0 retweets 4 likesShow this thread -
These errors all stem from the same wickedly wrong idea: from the Enlightenment view that humans are goal-driven, and thus that social life is contractual. It will take time: to rescue our non-goal drives & our non-contractual relationships; to believe we can build on them.
3 replies 1 retweet 12 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @edelwax
Interesting, thank you for posting. A small nuance: it seems to me that the mistake was to assume humans are always/ only goal driven. While we should design much more for values, I think it would be the same mistake to think humans are always/only value driven.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
It would be a mistake to remove the contractual nature from all of social life, it's highly useful. I happen to think humans are not values driven either. But whatever drives us will always be very contextual, and a mix of goals, values, impulses, desires, fears and dreams.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.