Stage 3 institutions do not have explicit boundaries and they encompass all of life. In this way they function kinda like a dialect continuum where they slowly blend into each other and you only get sharp boundaries where people don't interact with each other.
-
-
Seems like stage 4 orgs are "meant" to be enduring. And stage 5 orgs are "meant" to be voluntary, flexible, and likely to fade away, or reinvented over and over.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Good point about the limitations of voluntary institutions (
@_awbery_ is eloquent on this point having coordinated several). The Gigantic Chart says “Transitory organizations spontaneously assemble within a durable social infrastructure matrix” fwiwpic.twitter.com/HLuZMdQFUR
-
Yes, I agree re the limitations of typical vol orgs. Also, see no reason that stage 5 institutions should not also operate with commitment, without being defined by it - each stage contains the functionality of the previous ones.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.