Sasha Samberg-Champion

@ssamcham

Civil rights lawyer. Former government lawyer, emphasis on former. Husband. Father. Basketball has-been. Name now fits on Twitter!

Joined February 2017

Tweets

You blocked @ssamcham

Are you sure you want to view these Tweets? Viewing Tweets won't unblock @ssamcham

  1. There is nothing funny about the Republican Party’s multipronged attack on voting rights, says 

    Undo
  2. 9 hours ago

    I look forward to "appellate review of denial of a motion to amend the complaint" twitter, since every other legal doctrine has had its moment in the sun in the Trump Administration.

    Show this thread
    Undo
  3. 9 hours ago

    The answer, actually, is yes. See Foman v. Davis, 371 U.S. 178 (1962), the patron saint of losing plaintiffs everywhere.

    Show this thread
    Undo
  4. 9 hours ago

    If you stop thinking of Trump's post-election litigation as a good faith effort to win in court, and think of it instead as a grifting scheme, it makes a lot more sense.

    Undo
  5. 10 hours ago

    So the Trump campaign has decided to pin the blame for botched district court litigation on Linda Kerns being terrified of a Kirkland & Ellis associate and not doing her job. Okay then.

    Undo
  6. 18 hours ago

    Strong piece by on why Trump’s attempts to have state legislatures steal the election will likely and hopefully fail.

    Undo
  7. 18 hours ago

    Both and I served as Deputy Assistant Attorneys General for Civil Rights at the US Department of Justice. Here, we argue that if the canvassers refuse to certify Michigan's vote today they will be violating a Voting Rights Act provision w/criminal penalties.

    Undo
  8. Nov 22

    If Trump was surprised by his loss in the PA suit, he's not getting very good legal counsel from anyone.

    Undo
  9. Nov 22

    The legal "strategy" pursued by the Trump campaign makes more sense if you don't think of its purpose as winning in court.

    Undo
  10. Nov 22

    We are not asking much of elected Republicans. The fear of being targeted by a presidential tweet and gaining a primary opponent is real enough. But it is hardly the risk of a young soldier on D-Day, or a protester at a segregated lunch counter. 11/

    Undo
  11. Nov 21

    Let's just establish in advance that it will not make the Supreme Court liberal, or even moderate, when it declines to hear this frivolous case.

    Undo
  12. Nov 20

    Trump's lawyers said the other day that the press refuses to look at all the evidence the president and his allies have put forward of a massive scheme to rig the election. I did. Georgia edition, from the case filed by Trump ally L. Lin Wood ->

    Show this thread
    Undo
  13. Nov 20

    The commitment to comply with the ADA apparently extends just far enough to have an excuse for not following mask requirements, but not far enough to actually provide access.

    Undo
  14. The Supreme Court’s embrace of the QUALIFIED IMMUNITY legal defense for cops in excessive force cases is on a collision course with another legal issue the conservative justices have championed: gun rights The latest part of our investigation:

    Show this thread
    Undo
  15. Nov 20

    "Doing that would be contrary to all of our democratic principles," the aides failed to respond.

    Undo
  16. Nov 19

    We all laugh at the frivolous arguments being made by the Trump lawyers, but the real takeaway is that they don't need good arguments to get political backing. Imagine what a nightmare we'd have right now if the arguments rose to the level of being weak.

    Undo
  17. Nov 19

    LOL. The ballots were fine right up the ballot to the presidential vote, which was fake.

    Undo
  18. Nov 19

    🧵THREAD: Today, ’s new president, Charlie Oppler, issued an apology for the association’s past policies & practices that contributed to segregation and racial inequality in America. (1/6)

    Show this thread
    Undo
  19. Nov 19

    It's not about Trump. We've always known he would do this. It's about all the other people who are enabling it.

    Undo
  20. Nov 19

    This is the most important legal point about all of these lawsuits: What you’re hearing from the crazy people on TV is very different from what the crazy people are *alleging* in court — and it’s the *latter* that matters if these suits are anything other than political stunts.

    Undo

Loading seems to be taking a while.

Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

    You may also like

    ·