No, too few people understand it and its relevance is too widely disputed.
-
-
-
disputed -> recklessly ignored
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
No, because the faith in the 21M meme is stronger than the understanding of the this mid-to-longterm security risk.
- Još 3 druga odgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Not sure that's even possible to price in. Hard to measure the risk of that
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
I'd guess many that know are simply betting that by the time this is consequential, Bitcoin will be 'too big to fail' & update monetary policy to fix issues. Price includes an option on that fork, though this is definitely not understood by most (?)
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
Estimating the security budget is really hard as it is directly related to the BTC price. But I would argue that the current mindset of the Bitcoin community significantly discounts this risk.
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
Yes, because you have people on the spectrum that do not perceive it as a risk. Then you have others who think bitcoin is doomed to fail because of this. Then you have some in the middle. Enough people are aware about it for it to have an impact on price.
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
The market is perfectly rational , but will stay irrational longer than you will remain liquid ...
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
There are probably less than 100 people in the industry actually willing to objectively talk about it
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.
