Isn't the entirety of beard's argument against Kickvic based on how Vic Mignona was called a "piece of shit" and beardo's response "he's not actually being a piece of shit" so that is defamatory? Aren't you defaming him, and, if beard is right (heh), you have just boned yourself?
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
No, no it isn't. Maybe learn something about the TDMA before assuming. You seriously took a furry's word over a lawyer. You are the bottom of the barrel, kid.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Bottom part, sweetie. Beard has hairs, so he does qualify as a furry.pic.twitter.com/z6sgXmfwO0
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
You're.......you're beyond help.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
according to Beard's own letter. If one is right and the other is wrong, there's trouble for the plaintiff.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
You are so beyond help, it's laughable. Ron must prove each and every statement to be irrefutably true. All 400 tweets about Vic. Each claim he made, no matter how much of an exaggeration, must be undeniably true.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.