This is a contrived approach serving no purpose other than as a vanity metric for some in Top 10. Would a small startup with more or all of its employers contributing to open source as #1? #vanitymetrics /cc @mjasay
-
-
Replying to @sriramhere @cra
If it's a vanity metric it sure doesn't help my employer. ;-) (You'd think if I were aiming for vanity I would have found a way to include us and not a competitor. It's imperfect data, but it's still interesting, IMO.)
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Hey Matt, I don’t question your intention or integrity. It just didn’t seem meaningful. It might even make people question those that are really contributing (like MS)
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @sriramhere @cra
But you'd find that some *do* think percentage of employees (or engineers) contributing is a big deal. Google already commented that they measure it and they're #1. :-)
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Yes - those interested in vanity metrics, so that they can boast :). What is higher - 40% of 1000 or 3% of 131,000 or 100% of a hypothetical 5 member startup? Contribution per employee also differs within/ across companies, how would you account for that?
5 replies 1 retweet 5 likes -
Replying to @sriramhere @cra
At any rate, what I'm *most* happy about is that you're apparently volunteering to put together the perfect way to measure open source contributions. I await your largesse :-)
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
:). Thank you for volunteering me in. My contribution would be most likely be around quantifying how open source helps/ enables end user, than who is contributing/ how much.
2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
You know what? There is a whole project
@linuxfoundation around community metrics - CHAOSS. With some wonderful projects like GrimoireLab to pull out real metrics (https://chaoss.github.io/grimoirelab/ ) Simply looking at Github doesn’t show what’s actually happening in open source as a whole.2 replies 3 retweets 13 likes -
Replying to @TechJournalist @sriramhere and
Sounds good yet I've seen nothing emerge from it. Does no one use this because it's not yet ready or because few yet know about it?
5 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @mjasay @TechJournalist and
The tools are used, I used them extensively at OpenStack to drive change before CHAOSS was even established
1 reply 1 retweet 5 likes
Have a look at the kind of in-depth reporting I did with @Bitergia @dizquierdo https://blog.bitergia.com/tag/openstack/ The quarterly report especially has data to help reduce time to merge a patchset (amont other things) http://activity.openstack.org/dash/reports/2015-q4/pdf/2015-q4_OpenStack_report.pdf … (page 19-20)
-
-
-
Replying to @lcooney @smaffulli
If you have any comment or question, please let me know!
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like - 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.