I'm in the "it depends on your situation and requirements" camp. Mostly bothered by the tone of the discussions I've seen lately and what I perceive as dogma. (I might also just be cranky)
-
-
And is CSS really ok? There has been an explosion of tools whose primary value is that they turn off specificity and the cascade (Inc CSS-in-JS tools). Teaching the "C" is a nightmare. Folks rightly want fewer foot-guns.
-
I think CSS is fine, but I've worked with it for about 15 years. I understand it & I appreciate how it works. Most of these tools feel like they're just made for people that don't want to understand CSS & they try to make it more like JS. But I realize I'm probably a minority.
- 9 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks for this. I had only read the one on Tab's site. There certainly is a strong need for this. For me the issue is that it seems expectation is the same person is building the component & writing the CSS. The component needs to be composed to know what parts are inside.
-
So CSS has to be handled post "part-marking"? (Sorry, Twitter makes it hard to have a meaningful discussion. LOL) I need coffee...
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
& Web Standards TL; Blink API OWNER
Named PWAs w/
DMs open. Tweets my own; press@google.com for official comms.
state, reduce the "bleed through" that makes managing styles so painful.
Good progress being made on part/theme: