I wonder how many years of evidence to the contrary it will take to convince tech journos to stop calling Qualcomm chips "powerful":https://www.cnet.com/news/samsung-sets-galaxy-s9-unveiling-for-feb-25-mwc-2018/ …
-
-
Also, note that we're talking about a future part vs. current parts. If the 845 isn't lapping *current* Apple parts, it's defacto behind.
-
So I guess my request is this: as journalists, please stop uncritically relaying what vendors say when they've got this much of a track-record of
#FAIL
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
There's more detail here: https://www.anandtech.com/show/12114/qualcomm-announces-snapdragon-845-soc … L3 separate to system cache will help. Reason for limited optimism. Maybe only one gen behind?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
& Web Standards TL; Blink API OWNER
Named PWAs w/
DMs open. Tweets my own; press@google.com for official comms.