What I'd hoped to see was more dialogue and an improved feedback loop between frameworks and standards.
-
-
Replying to @morewry @notwaldorf and
For all I know there may be, but I haven't, for example, heard of any React-sourced standards proposals from Facebook.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @morewry @notwaldorf and
Sure, low level is in there, but so is "virtuous cycle," and prioritizing efforts that align over those that don't.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @morewry @slightlylate and
I mean wc was specced as v0 for 3 years before the spec settled; similarly, Houdini?
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @notwaldorf @slightlylate and
Can you expand on that? Not sure I get what you mean.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @morewry @slightlylate and
The web components spec wasn’t final for like over 3 years as developers/browsers weren’t convinced it was ready to be final. Isn’t that the virtuous cycle?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @notwaldorf @slightlylate and
Hmm. Food for thought. But if WCs are a good example of the end game, well, refer to this thread's OP.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @morewry @notwaldorf and
React engineers have showed up to TC39; that has been pretty positive for everyone. That said, React takes a different approach to platform evolution than, e.g., Polymer does. We can only hold the door open, can't make them walk through it.
1 reply 0 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @slightlylate @morewry and
And what
@notwaldorf said is right: extensible web manifesto has been hugely influential. Lots of proposals for new one-off, high-level attributes and elements have been shot down as a result.1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @slightlylate @notwaldorf and
That's good to hear! That's not the type of thing that would be especially visible to me. Little more focused on what gets done vs what doesn't, but both are important.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
I hesitate to write up (or talk about) a lot of what we've done in this area, but this thread makes me think that perhaps I should.
/cc @kosamari
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @treshugart @morewry and
A few reasons (in no particular order): - There's a lot of resistance to change and conspiracy theories (and theorists) abound - Because this is a political arena, it's frequently necessary to be less-than-blunt to remain effective - The TL;DR will be unsatisfying for many
0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
End of conversation
-
-
-
Replying to @slightlylate @notwaldorf and
I mean, I'd be interested, and I can think of arguments in favor. But I'm sure you have your reasons for hesitating.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
& Web Standards TL; Blink API OWNER
Named PWAs w/
DMs open. Tweets my own; press@google.com for official comms.