Would folks from Stencil and Skate be interested in attending things like TPAC in the future? I went this year and found it surprisingly easy to voice concerns to working group members
-
-
It should be said that I think this is the first TPAC where I have seem people from Polymer actually participate
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @kennethrohde @rob_dodson and
I think it was, though we've been ad f2f meetings before, but so were Ember representatives and I think Angular had been invited. It's mostly about knowing about these things, I think everyone's welcome.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @justinfagnani @kennethrohde and
FWIW the chair of the webplat meeting also specifically asked the invited experts to make their voices heard and not be worried about being in over their heads. That the WG really craves their feedback.
2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @rob_dodson @justinfagnani and
Am I right in thinking it’s rare to see FW / org representation in TPAC et al? In my head I’m comparing it to TC39, which I think has a lot of rep from FWs / orgs, Airbnb, PayPal, FB etc...? Not just implementers. Though is it fair to compare the two?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @BedeOverend @justinfagnani and
Hard for me to answer because I've never been to tc39
@slightlylate what would you say?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @rob_dodson @BedeOverend and
We have worked to get (many) more FW people involved in standards since '10. Has been a slow build. Lots of nuance and uneven progress.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @slightlylate @rob_dodson and
Starting in '10/'11, we (Chrome) started trying to encourage more JS users to attend TC39. Has had a big effect, but took a long time.
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @slightlylate @rob_dodson and
For W3C designs, the big change has to been to move many design discussions to WICG and other incubation forums.
2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @slightlylate @rob_dodson and
Lots of legacy in this process, but my goal is to make our feature development (and the eventual standards that come from it) evidence-based.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes
So libraries, polyfills, and developer interests should be the basis for what problems we work to solve, even if we can't get everyone in the room.
-
-
Replying to @slightlylate @rob_dodson and
This is pretty different to how features have historically been added and prioritised.
1 reply 1 retweet 5 likes -
Replying to @slightlylate @rob_dodson and
There's a lot of nuance here: Chrome has limited influence (lots of folks don't agree that incubation and evidence-based design are better), and we don't just scribble down what frameworks do (for obvious reasons).
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes - 8 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
& Web Standards TL; Blink API OWNER
Named PWAs w/
DMs open. Tweets my own; press@google.com for official comms.