Or to paraphrase Tim: "this is for some (rich) people"
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
We seem to have reached a place where rich web engineer privilege is so entrenched that we now exclude on the basis of script payload too.
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Brutal.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Sadly, it's hard to convince people that no framework is often the best (and easiest) choice.
-
I'm not anti-framework, I'm anti-inappropriate-engineering-choices.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Why single out frameworks? Libs and plain old HTML+CSS can be inaccessible too.
-
What you want is good design and engineering practices for accessibility supported by audits and testing. That's framework agnostic.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
For a first page load bundle, what would be your cutoff for a rich-person-only site?
-
~100-120k of critical-path resources is pretty good line, particularly if it's mostly JS.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
& Web Standards TL; Blink API OWNER
Named PWAs w/
DMs open. Tweets my own; press@google.com for official comms.