This is why I encourage teams to focus on "Time to Interactive"; it lies to you less about the real-world experience.https://twitter.com/justinfagnani/status/893134662767226880 …
-
-
Replying to @slightlylate
In the small tests that I've run, SSR improved time to interactive, have you not been finding that? I'd love to compare notes
4 replies 0 retweets 15 likes -
Replying to @sarah_edo
Have not been seeing that. Many sites are using "SSR" to get content rendered, but it then becomes unusable due to long script eval...
2 replies 0 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @slightlylate @sarah_edo
...which would be bad enough, except that "SSR" techniques (done naively) also frequently delay time-to-first-byte too.
3 replies 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @slightlylate @sarah_edo
thank you for saying this alex, I always try to point out this bit of nuance here but nuance is hard. lots of inputs to whether ssr is A+
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
I've been saying it since I started seeing teams use "SSR" as a justification shipping slow sites:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a5X_Ot-R6lo …
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
& Web Standards TL; Blink API OWNER
Named PWAs w/
DMs open. Tweets my own; press@google.com for official comms.