This is why I encourage teams to focus on "Time to Interactive"; it lies to you less about the real-world experience.https://twitter.com/justinfagnani/status/893134662767226880 …
-
-
Is this for heavy interaction sites? Seems like primarily consumption sites would have big benefits from SSR
-
Riddle me this: how am I meant to know _which_ 50% of interactions won't work on a site like that?
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
thank you for saying this alex, I always try to point out this bit of nuance here but nuance is hard. lots of inputs to whether ssr is A+
-
I've been saying it since I started seeing teams use "SSR" as a justification shipping slow sites:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a5X_Ot-R6lo …
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
So you get the worst of both worlds: JS payload (needed for interactivity) delayed by SSR, then rendered content stuck in uncanny valley.
-
I agree with SSR done naively. But I'd question that all SSR sites are slow. We've seen otherwise with LinkedIn Lite.
- 5 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
& Web Standards TL; Blink API OWNER
Named PWAs w/
DMs open. Tweets my own; press@google.com for official comms.