If your site has more than 500k of JS (uncompressed), you don't get to look down on "jQuery developers".
-
-
Replying to @ken_wheeler @amarkon88 and
Seems to me that depends on the ability of the community to accept that you need to set budgets and live within them.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @slightlylate @ken_wheeler and
Only if the makers of the platform accept that we need better platform tools as well. Why do I have to install a validation and component...
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @amarkon88 @slightlylate and
...lib just to get a validated email field? Why is an email input that conforms to RFC not a standard component?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @amarkon88 @ken_wheeler and
You mean like <input type="email">? https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTML/Element/input/email … Question there is why validation isn't accessible w/o element.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @slightlylate @ken_wheeler and
Core issue is the same. We need *accessible* validation, inaccessible validation for modern FWs is as good as no validation
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @amarkon88 @slightlylate and
This is kind of the problem. "There's technically a solution already" is used as a reason to not push the platform to be better
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
So the @w3ctag is starting to take a crack at the Big Specs; factoring out the mixins that HTML is conceptually composed of is on the agenda
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
& Web Standards TL; Blink API OWNER
Named PWAs w/
DMs open. Tweets my own; press@google.com for official comms.