Among economists, there is near-universal acceptance that immigration generates huge benefits http://econ.st/2oH4w7a pic.twitter.com/PeemedZ7EJ
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
The evidence for host country gains also strong, particularly in societies like the UK, JP, and US which face low birth rates & pop decline
You are pretending that people are fungible units of labor and that cultural and ethnic strife can be dismissed. In fact they wrote history.
Native populations stabilize regardless as their more pro-natal subsets simply outbreed the others. E.g. conservatives > liberals.
I speculate that mass immigration may be simply a left-wing ploy to avoid becoming terminally outnumbered in voting, by replacing society.
Moreover, wrong on costs. U.S. illegals estimated cost: USD 80-100bn/year net to gov't. 16% migrants in Sweden use over 50% of welfare. Etc.
Which in turn means it becomes effectively a government wage subsidy to business for the use of cheap quasi-indentured labor.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.