there needs to be balance. I'm just saying that TTI isn't the _only_ metric that matters to users. They like new features, too
-
-
Replying to @BenLesh @slightlylate
quality of existing features is often better than new features. New features didn't make the iPhone a success.
2 replies 0 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @jaffathecake @slightlylate
Improving quality of existing features still relies on your ability to rapidly make changes, A/B test etc
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
the oversight here is that frameworks/etc wouldn't have come into existence if the platform wasn't painful
2 replies 0 retweets 6 likes -
From the outside it seems platform folks aren't _really_ working with framework folks and vice versa, AFAICT.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
The platform's state the driver for all FW existence, if you want to eliminate FWs, improve the platform.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BenLesh
: it's an interesting assertion. My experience is that tools do not use what is already there, targeting LCD instead
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @slightlylate @BenLesh
: e.g., why do most of these toolchains bloat the JS they transpile for browsers that have those features natively?
4 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @slightlylate @BenLesh
: we all know the answer to that question, but it highlights an important thing about "the platform"
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @slightlylate @BenLesh
: if we ship improvements to *most* users, but tools prevent benefits from being realised, who's holding us back?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
: when we say "use the platform", it's a plea to only tax those without modern runtimes for missing capabilities
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
& Web Standards TL; Blink API OWNER
Named PWAs w/
DMs open. Tweets my own; press@google.com for official comms.