For the main books grid, the results I'm seeing seem pretty tame / reasonable. 3/
-
-
Replying to @AdamRackis
Sending down the full React/Redux stack, plus a JS color-picker, a react auto-suggest, plus my app code -> 331Kpic.twitter.com/TKp0zt9R4b
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @AdamRackis
So I do have 100's KB, but that's for the whole application & I'm not even SW-caching unchanging utilities yet. (I _am_ gzipping/minifying)
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @AdamRackis
Prior tweet from
@slightlylate motivated me to look at these numbers: I believe he said a certain JS FW was in an ad, pushing like 500K down1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @AdamRackis
*Are there even* js frameworks that ship that much code?! @.@
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @AdamRackis
: my critique isn't that FWs are that large (although most *are* too big), it's that the patterns they encourage make sites slow
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @slightlylate
: the default way people use, e.g. React, is to bundle the whole app into a single JS file. This is a recipe for slowness.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @slightlylate
Interesting and unfortunate. No matter if you're using Webpack or SystemJS, code splitting is so easy these days :\
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @AdamRackis
: ...but that's not what the starter guides, default CLI options, etc. lead the developer to do.
4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @slightlylate
True. Are they assuming devs will be under some sort of senior / knowledgeable dev prior to publishing into the real world?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
: who knows? What I observe is that even great teams from BigCo's fail to re-examine these assumptions until it's waaay too late.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
& Web Standards TL; Blink API OWNER
Named PWAs w/
DMs open. Tweets my own; press@google.com for official comms.