100% agree. Does "throw out your frameworks" help accomplish this? Everyone here agreeing except for that slogan.
-
-
Replying to @asolove
: helps people understand the overhead/value tradeoff more clearly. Most haven't seen a zero-js page in years.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @slightlylate @asolove
: we can add FWs back in, but only when we start from fast and don't let that regress.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @slightlylate @asolove
: there are vanishingly few acceptable FW-bases approaches today: Polymer PRPL, Preact's new stuff, FK React work
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @slightlylate @jordwalke
How interesting that none of those three meet your slogan "throw out your frameworks."
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @asolove
: they're the few that don't require it. I hope that set grows!
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @slightlylate @jordwalke
if you accept that sociology of webdevs led to current bad situation, how does what we say/do help?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
If you say "no frameworks", devs will look elsewhere because they have shit to do now and want a pattern.
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @asolove
: I said start without, add back what you can under-budget
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @slightlylate @jordwalke
So this whole thing is like an article with a link bait title that walks it back in the text no one reads?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
: you couldn't read the one sentence in the next tweet? ;-)
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
& Web Standards TL; Blink API OWNER
Named PWAs w/
DMs open. Tweets my own; press@google.com for official comms.