-
-
cc
@littledan2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @addyosmani @cramforce and
Modules specified inline were previously proposed at TC39, but not included in the final spec.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @littledan @addyosmani and
because, zip files accomplish same thing w/o complicating the language
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @awbjs @littledan and
they do. Are JAR style zip files on a standards track?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @cramforce @littledan and
Extralingual, so not within TC39 charter. Platform standards (eg, HTML) could spec.
3 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @awbjs @littledan and
maybe
@slightlylate knows who should do it. I remember Mozilla tried about 5y ago.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @cramforce @awbjs and
: we're working on it. Reviving this: https://www.w3.org/TR/web-packaging/ …
3 replies 2 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @slightlylate
would like to know a good way to get into the loop on this as an outsider Electron has .asar & I had .noda; unification ideal
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @bradleymeck
: we're going to make an updated proposal a WICG, so watch for it here:https://discourse.wicg.io/
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
: feature's we need to add are: - better index - signing - some URL changes folks have asked for (but which may not make it)
-
-
Replying to @slightlylate
did this ever happen? or is there a good place to get this rolling?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
& Web Standards TL; Blink API OWNER
Named PWAs w/
DMs open. Tweets my own; press@google.com for official comms.