the better programmers suck less? 
-
-
Replying to @kaihendry
: wasn't trying to call out their maintainers. The protocol makes sense. I just don't want anything other than websocket support.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @slightlylate @kaihendry
it's a different browser population now. I fully expect us to do per-client compiles at some point.
3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
if you just want websocket support, why aren't you just using a websocket?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @dakami
: 'cause I also want reliable setup and to not write the handshake dance for weekend project.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @slightlylate @kaihendry
...then why clean up socket.io? (Not being rhetorical, curious here.)
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @dakami
: 1.) sort of doing that, but hack/slash style (socket.io-client uses engine-io.client now) 2.) most folk need fallbacks
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @slightlylate @kaihendry
ahh you're not ripping out fallbacks but there's other cruft?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @dakami
: oh, I am ripping out fallbacks. The thing here is that socket.io does more than WS; nice abstraction
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
have you seen ws? which non-fallback abstraction is it that you like? https://www.npmjs.com/package/ws
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
: yeah, was looking at that. May move to it.
/cc @dakami @kaihendry
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
& Web Standards TL; Blink API OWNER
Named PWAs w/
DMs open. Tweets my own; press@google.com for official comms.