: was discussed frequently. We'd like to do it. Need other vendors to sign on.
/cc @domenic @tabatkins
-
-
Yup. I'm personally waiting for Shadow DOM v1 to stabilize in the wild before starting effort.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @tabatkins @slightlylate and
Want to see usage patterns first to make sure we don't under/overdesign. Too easy of a trap.
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Very keen for this, heard a lot of concern re WC + server side rendering, can't see a proper soln w/o this
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BedeOverend @tabatkins
: it's a one-liner to take a <template> and install it as a shadow root. Not fully declarative, tho.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
yeah, if your server can't generate one line of JS, you have other problems.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @domenic
: think the issue
@BedeOverend is raising is needing JS at all for what can be declaratively hooked up. Should get there1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Exactly. Concerns I've heard are both perf and accessibility. Seems fully declarative resolves both those
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BedeOverend @domenic
: not sure declarative would be that much better in terms of perf. But a11y maybe. Perhaps. But probably not
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
: googlebot (at least) runs script
-
-
Replying to @slightlylate @treshugart and
If A11y and perf are essentially already addressed, is declarative style the core benefit?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
: I assume so. Also easier to CSP-ify.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like - 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
& Web Standards TL; Blink API OWNER
Named PWAs w/
DMs open. Tweets my own; press@google.com for official comms.