When I helped start the Web Components effort, a goal was to end framework wars at the component level. About time:https://twitter.com/domenic/status/769344873027829760 …
-
-
.
@slightlylate this is exactly the problem I have with Web Components: instead of designed to complement existing FWs, it is designed with -
: huh? You can use each of the pieces independently, and it absolutely interoperates. If your FW genereates DOM, it can use WC.
- 25 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Which is it say, it's cool. You can do that. It'll still work. Just don't expect for anyone to think of your thing as "modern" or "fast".
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Web Components, being out of touch with modern frameworks, are the 2016 equivalent of <blink>.
-
Interesting assertion. In what way are they out of touch?
@slightlylate - 4 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
& Web Standards TL; Blink API OWNER
Named PWAs w/
DMs open. Tweets my own; press@google.com for official comms.