: which means that for some sites -- more than I think a lot of old hands want to admit -- it's reasonable
-
-
: so blanket "things should work without JS" statements are, in my view, not even wrong.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
: govt information/service websites? Hell yes it should work without JS. Some plain documents too.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
: and many more should absolutely progressively enhance using web components
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
: but some -- maybe many -- are natural adopters of a better vocabulary, and that can require JS; that's *fine*
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @slightlylate @sil and
I also appreciate the practically of running a business crashing against ideals.
#HighBarsRGood1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
: how did Walmart address this question when you were there?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @slightlylate @sil and
had to struggle through, trying to hit numbers and weave to the ideal. Had a min bar for no js
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
: did no-js version help revenue?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @slightlylate @sil and
negligible, was more for scraping sites and bots.... So indirectly.... Bit as bots get better...
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
: interesting. Thanks!
-
-
Replying to @slightlylate @dalmaer and
this is about cases when js fails to load/execute? That seems like a case more worth supporting...
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @scottjehl @slightlylate and
at least, it's a case that happens to me regularly ... On my iPhone with 4g-ish service
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes - 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
& Web Standards TL; Blink API OWNER
Named PWAs w/
DMs open. Tweets my own; press@google.com for official comms.