arguably it may have, when you installed chrome. once installed worry is quality. post argues both solvable @scottjehl @slightlylate
-
-
sure thing. If you can guarantee that my scripts arrive and are unaltered, I'm happy to rely on them
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @sil @briankardell
: the important thing to understand as a web dev is that we make suggestions, we don't send edicts
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
: and, as our apps crawl away from the "natural language" of HTML, we find the JS crutch becomes an exoskeleton
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
: necessary in some environments; not "natural", but also not "wrong" or unholy
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
: take, e.g., http://shop.polymer-project.org
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
: works in scads of browsers, is a commercial(ish) site; the value of "works w/o JS" is measurable in ecommerce
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
: and many commerce sites are happy to take a JS dependency.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
: it's 2016. Hand-wringing about what happens if JS isn't available is a bit..strange?
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
: look at how many blocking requests these sorts of sites do. Their dep chains are already huge
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
: now, I'm not saying "things should require JS"; I'm saying "the platform hasn't kept up, JS is how you cope"
-
-
: which means that for some sites -- more than I think a lot of old hands want to admit -- it's reasonable
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
: so blanket "things should work without JS" statements are, in my view, not even wrong.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes - 8 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
& Web Standards TL; Blink API OWNER
Named PWAs w/
DMs open. Tweets my own; press@google.com for official comms.