I've always said there were only 2 reasons to do Promises: 1.) end library wars 2.) to give them async/await syntaxhttps://twitter.com/indutny/status/732568141251944448 …
-
-
Replying to @slightlylate
That new syntax is soooo much more readable than the typical callback hell I see with promises.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @mwop
I mean, it's not like we (
@ErikArvidsson, Peter Hallam, Martin Malley, et. al) proposed this 5 years ago...oh http://wiki.ecmascript.org/doku.php?id=strawman:deferred_functions …1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @slightlylate
: basically everything about the way TC39 has treated recent improvements makes me think there must be another, better way.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @slightlylate
: it's not like we were slacking; we prototyped, built transpilers, did library study, etc. TC39 is where good things go to be delayed
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
: what's astonishing to me is that there are committee members who still think it's going *well* O_o
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
& Web Standards TL; Blink API OWNER
Named PWAs w/
DMs open. Tweets my own; press@google.com for official comms.