Thing that bugs me: the moment in a standards meeting when I realize 100% of the folks in the conversation are (self-identified) dudes.
-
-
Replying to @slightlylate
Hot tip!: building a platform for the entire world that excludes 50% of it (however unintentionally) from the debate is BS.
3 replies 5 retweets 12 likes -
Replying to @slightlylate
For folks following earlier tweets: this is part of the reason for the incubation-first policy in Blink/Chrome. I'm sick of powerful people.
1 reply 3 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @slightlylate
Powerful people make environments that are comfortable to them _because they can_. Not evil, just human nature. But we need to re-litigate.
2 replies 4 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @slightlylate
The terms of each feature should be set by the constituency that every designer can cobble together, not the (exclusionary) status-quo.
1 reply 3 retweets 0 likes
This, BTW, is also good for the designers: the other way leads to groupthink (see: CSS, HTML5, etc.) which causes "regretted features"
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
& Web Standards TL; Blink API OWNER
Named PWAs w/
DMs open. Tweets my own; press@google.com for official comms.