@jaffathecake It sounds like @firt's point is that we should stop talking about SW as a "replacement" for App Cache.
-
-
Replying to @tomdale
@tomdale@jaffathecake well, that's basically the article's title. But some people don't read the "as AppCache replacement" part of it2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @jaffathecake
@firt@tomdale unfortunately it's being (willfully?) misinterpreted by those with power to steer browser direction1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @jaffathecake
@jaffathecake@firt@tomdale You overestimate my power. I’m free to have my own opinions.1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @jaffathecake
@jaffathecake Most uses cases I have heard from developers want a simple way to have a cached shell for their page. That should not be hard.1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @xeenon
@jaffathecake Full offline support can progressively get low-level and complex, but the simple cases should not be complex or a lot to code.2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @xeenon
@xeenon@jaffathecake: see: https://github.com/GoogleChrome/sw-toolbox … https://github.com/GoogleChrome/sw-precache …1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @slightlylate
Timothy Hatcher Retweeted Timothy Hatcher
@slightlylate@jaffathecake I refer you to Exhibit A:https://twitter.com/xeenon/status/721088923963789312 …Timothy Hatcher added,
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@xeenon @jaffathecake: Cool. Reliable performance isn't for everyone, but if you have concrete suggestions, please file bugs in the repo!
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
& Web Standards TL; Blink API OWNER
Named PWAs w/
DMs open. Tweets my own; press@google.com for official comms.