@tomcoates @JZdziarski: ok, then you're processing the cognitive dissonance? Or think Apple means what they say when it affects Palo Alto?
@tomcoates @JZdziarski: no, but Apple's case in the US is about local law. But they can also be undermining users elsewhere.
-
-
@slightlylate@jzdziarski That they often comply with law enforcement and indeed did in this case too, is in most articles about the case. -
@slightlylate@jzdziarski Yes, they are also walking a fine line in that they comply with laws elsewhere that we’re not keen on. - 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
@slightlylate@jzdziarski Okay, Number 1, regarding Apple’s coyness. They describe what they do in their letter: http://www.apple.com/customer-letter -
@slightlylate@jzdziarski They publish transparency reports: http://www.apple.com/privacy/transparency-reports/ …
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
& Web Standards TL; Blink API OWNER
Named PWAs w/
DMs open. Tweets my own; press@google.com for official comms.