>= node@4.x.x supports Promises so should we support that and err first callbacks? https://gist.github.com/brianleroux/b40852d9ef7ddb162d83 …pic.twitter.com/vrtIgH0RLu
-
-
Replying to @brianleroux
.
@brianleroux I don't understand why people replace callbacks with a heavier solution. We need a lighter closure-less c-style interface.2 replies 1 retweet 4 likes -
Replying to @Raynos
@Raynos@brianleroux: "closureless" and "lighter weight" in the same sentence. Lawlz.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @slightlylate
@Raynos@brianleroux: I mean, we *could* go back to '07 VMs....but nah. Too much effort for too little humor value.2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @slightlylate
@slightlylate rust and c++11 have exciting zero cost closures. I there any js vm that implements that?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @slightlylate
@slightlylate I just want to write performant libraries. Every little helps... The v8 vm is incredible. If I want any features it's i64.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @slightlylate
@slightlylate we use one line closures that call methods. Callbacks are only called once, cold IC. We want to call optimized methods2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
& Web Standards TL; Blink API OWNER
Named PWAs w/
DMs open. Tweets my own; press@google.com for official comms.