Important for @w3c participants to recall charters aren't free and extensions aren't automatic. They are affirmative signals of consent.
@mnot @sideshowbarker: sorry, no, this is backwards and how you (roughly) get optimism instead of progress. See also: SemWeb
-
-
@slightlylate@mnot@sideshowbarker semweb got its academic tone when@w3c continued RDF outside chartered process (AC only liked XML ~1999) -
@slightlylate@mnot@sideshowbarker@w3c whether RIF etc should have gone rectrack is another Q. Orig project derailed by academia not from. - 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
@slightlylate@mnot@sideshowbarker external researchers + their funders latched onto it and took over slogan. Wasn't a charter creep probThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@slightlylate@mnot@sideshowbarker if Microsoft had stayed into rdf during 1998 things would have been very differentThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
& Web Standards TL; Blink API OWNER
Named PWAs w/
DMs open. Tweets my own; press@google.com for official comms.