Important for @w3c participants to recall charters aren't free and extensions aren't automatic. They are affirmative signals of consent.
-
-
@sideshowbarker: Mike and@adrianba have the right idea. This is a wise idea.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @slightlylate
@sideshowbarker: can't in good faith call those who oppose "reactionary", but can indict the poor outcomes as poor outcomes. Which they are.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @slightlylate
@sideshowbarker: and, btw, this is why I'm livid. Deadweight loss is A Thing (TM). Failure to do better really does hurt people.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @slightlylate
@sideshowbarker: WGs "camping out" on important problem spaces, being viewed as "the place" to work on something, is fundamentally caustic.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @slightlylate
@sideshowbarker: i.e., the notion that you'll invent something good in committee is fucked. Experientially, demonstrably, irrefutably f'd1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @slightlylate
@sideshowbarker: and structures that re-enforce this bias are actively harmful to the process of making progress a reality.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @slightlylate
@sideshowbarker: in fact, the name "Working Group" is wrong. It should be "Finishing Group" or "Final Review Group".1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@sideshowbarker: the notion that you'll "work on" something in a WG is so utterly backwards as to be hair-raising. It's process abdication.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
& Web Standards TL; Blink API OWNER
Named PWAs w/
DMs open. Tweets my own; press@google.com for official comms.