@sideshowbarker: Mike and @adrianba have the right idea. This is a wise idea.
-
-
-
@sideshowbarker: can't in good faith call those who oppose "reactionary", but can indict the poor outcomes as poor outcomes. Which they are. - 6 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
@sideshowbarker: the leadership you're looking for must take a different form: bravery to lower the drawbridge and invite the outside in. -
@sideshowbarker: it's why I'm hopeful about WICG, it lowers the barriers while providing an "on ramp" to formal process, which we still need - 13 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
@sideshowbarker: this is material expression of@w3c forgetting that the real, existing, honest-to-goodness web is the core of the endeavour -
@sideshowbarker: things are better of late, but you get a distinct sense that there's still a yearning for research to be treated as product - 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
@sideshowbarker: NB: if TAG is viewed as most functional part of your process, given that it has no power and no standing, time to rethink -
@sideshowbarker: specifically time to rethink HOW features get developed. TAG review is meant to nudge in good directions, not chart course - 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
@sideshowbarker: put another way, staff contact support should be "1FTE or GTFO". -
@sideshowbarker: which is another way of saying charters should be, as@danbri, windows: open for a while, not forever. - 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
& Web Standards TL; Blink API OWNER
Named PWAs w/
DMs open. Tweets my own; press@google.com for official comms.