The fact a particular terrorist plot did or did not use particular tools or technology tells us nothing about that technology
-
-
Replying to @benedictevans
If you want to persuade the public, making assertions that presuming your fringe political stance is universal will lose immediately
2 replies 4 retweets 13 likes -
Replying to @benedictevans
Many people are vague concerned about privacy and government surveillance. Very few fear that a particular measure is a step towards tyranny
6 replies 7 retweets 10 likes -
Replying to @benedictevans
When tech people say 'we're protecting privacy', that often comes across as 'we won't let the police do x because we don't want to'
5 replies 4 retweets 13 likes -
Replying to @benedictevans
And the public sees an arrogant technologist citing what seem like fringe and naive politics to defy public interest in law enforcement
4 replies 2 retweets 14 likes -
Replying to @benedictevans
@BenedictEvans: it's surprising to me that more folks don't point out the effectiveness of non-wiretap methods vs. bulk surveillance1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @slightlylate
@slightlylate because it's silly. Essentially you're arguing that reading people's emails doesn't work. fails the common sense test3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@BenedictEvans: agree it likely fails common sense test. Your natsec argument (and economic arguments that parallel it) are better.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
& Web Standards TL; Blink API OWNER
Named PWAs w/
DMs open. Tweets my own; press@google.com for official comms.