Sort of dissapointed to see @lyzadanger's SW post treating offline-as-enhancement as somehow bad: http://alistapart.com/column/how-do-we-get-it-done-now …
-
-
Replying to @slightlylate
Scott Jehl Retweeted Scott Jehl
@slightlylate@lyzadanger I related to it, fwiw.https://twitter.com/scottjehl/status/649260691640205312 …Scott Jehl added,
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @scottjehl
@slightlylate@lyzadanger I guess right now I wish sw could used to make an 'enhanced' version of the offline app others get with appcache2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
-
Replying to @slightlylate
@slightlylate its not an especially appealing option tbh as appcache itself isn't. But you can use sw as enhancement@scottjehl@lyzadanger1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @briankardell
@slightlylate@scottjehl@lyzadanger why's that a bad option. IMO: if you build it (progressively) they will come. Penalty too high if not1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @briankardell
@briankardell : Enjoying defeatist logic, tho: new good thing not everywhere. Lets not use it to make progress. /cc@scottjehl@lyzadanger2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @slightlylate
@slightlylate meh. there's things I feel frustrations w/similar to ones@lyzadanger/@scottjehl describe, SW just not necessarily 1 of them2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@briankardell: me too! But I check myself and work to avoid wallowing. Don't always succeed, but have to try.
/cc @lyzadanger @scottjehl
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
& Web Standards TL; Blink API OWNER
Named PWAs w/
DMs open. Tweets my own; press@google.com for official comms.