@patrickhamann @Paul_Kinlan @domenic maybe… streams could mean you server code becomes "isomorphic" and run in the SW
-
-
Replying to @jaffathecake
@patrickhamann@Paul_Kinlan@domenic but it'd work as usual without SW1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @jaffathecake
@jaffathecake@Paul_Kinlan@domenic but to "work as normal" without SW you'd still need to develop two versions of your server.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @patrickhamann
@jaffathecake@Paul_Kinlan@domenic I understand this would be advantageous to those with JS based rendering tiers (myself included).1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @patrickhamann
@jaffathecake@Paul_Kinlan@domenic but what about the rest?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @patrickhamann
@patrickhamann@Paul_Kinlan@domenic I'm hoping there could be a good amount of code sharing, but I know what you mean…1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @jaffathecake
@patrickhamann@Paul_Kinlan@domenic ultimately, to work offline, you need some kind of local server implementation1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @jaffathecake
@jaffathecake@Paul_Kinlan@domenic Agreed. Which, is still the bit I'm trying to get my head around for large deployments.5 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @patrickhamann
@patrickhamann : medium-term, frameworks can distinguish "shell" from "content" (aka a "partial") /cc@jaffathecake@Paul_Kinlan@domenic1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @slightlylate
@slightlylate Yes, but its this separation from shell and content that concerns me.@jaffathecake3 replies 0 retweets 1 like
@patrickhamann : I think this is swell, BTW. It's a new (better) thing for frameworks to compete on (also, sync)
/cc @jaffathecake
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
& Web Standards TL; Blink API OWNER
Named PWAs w/
DMs open. Tweets my own; press@google.com for official comms.