Imagine if ad blockers really wanted to be evil, or ‘immoral,’ they’d invisibly click on all the ads they block.
-
-
Replying to @jeremiahg
@jeremiahg: or shorter you: "petty theft isn't immoral, you know what's immoral? Grand larceny"1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @slightlylate
@slightlylate I don’t think ad blocking is at ALL evil, immoral, or illegal. Perhaps my language was unclear.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @jeremiahg
@jeremiahg : also, so we're clear, I have many moral problems with ads too, so I get where you're coming from, but i see market failure here1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @slightlylate
@slightlylate that’s interesting to me. what’s the ‘market failure’… or how best to describe it?1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @jeremiahg
@jeremiahg: market failure is that users and publishers can't agree on content price aside from ads; blockers aren't transparent, which hurt1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @slightlylate
@slightlylate not only, there doesn’t seem to be a payment app solution even if the price were agreed upon. need micro-payment finally.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@jeremiahg: agree! but you need the data in the first place; chunkier payment option can happen in interim
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
& Web Standards TL; Blink API OWNER
Named PWAs w/
DMs open. Tweets my own; press@google.com for official comms.