7. There would be more upside, more impact, and lower cost to the nation if we implemented a steadily rising revenue-neutral carbon tax.
@csuwildcat: you've given up on tax fungability (see: revenue neutral); unclear what policies are ever acceptable to you.
/cc @ramez
-
-
@csuwildcat: you're akso resorting to apocalyptic language about harm that isn't likely out real; see other climate regs. O_o /cc@ramez -
@csuwildcat : I'm pretty sure you're doing more harm to your cause (whatever it is) than helping it. /cc@ramez
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@slightlylate@ramez it's simple: a proximate doctrine of morality. Infringing on person/property w/o direct, legally proven harm is immoral -
@slightlylate@ramez coal plant harming someone? Go to civil court > produce directly affected parties with real standing > prove your case. - 2 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
& Web Standards TL; Blink API OWNER
Named PWAs w/
DMs open. Tweets my own; press@google.com for official comms.