@csuwildcat : why would you oppose raising them in that case?
-
-
Replying to @slightlylate
@slightlylate because our government is already operating outside its intended scope (empirically), thus it needs less money, not more.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @csuwildcat
@csuwildcat: interesting. You didn't participate in the scope-setting exercise. If it had initially been slightly larger, would that be bad?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @slightlylate
@slightlylate it would be bad. I'm just agreeing w/ the Framers where we share common ground. Not to say I wouldn't have wanted more liberty2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @csuwildcat
@csuwildcat : if the framers had specified a "freedom from unreasonable penury" (outlawing medical bankruptcy), would you support that?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @slightlylate
@slightlylate rights are inert, negative claims, thus that statement inherently cannot be the foundation of a right:pic.twitter.com/aaT7zRUoKr
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @csuwildcat
@csuwildcat : that's bunk by inspection. Nearly everything we do affects others (in fact, that's usually the motive)1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @slightlylate
@slightlylate name one natural right that is based on the undue infliction of harm or violation of another person's rights.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @csuwildcat
@csuwildcat : at the limit they must! It's why we have police forces! We do not live in absolutes.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @slightlylate
@slightlylate I disagree - can you be specific with an example that proves your claim?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@csuwildcat : ok, what right do you have in mind?
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
& Web Standards TL; Blink API OWNER
Named PWAs w/
DMs open. Tweets my own; press@google.com for official comms.