-
-
Replying to @slightlylate
@slightlylate Bollocks. If this were only about features with security implications, I would agree. But this is arbitrary.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @adactio
@adactio@slightlylate If Mozilla had put explicit dates on the timeline, I'd be worried. But it's dependent on wider SSL acceptance/ease.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @slightlylate
@slightlylate@yoz We must burn the web in order to save it.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @slightlylate
@slightlylate@yoz I. A. GREE! Please stop acting like I’m against encryption. But the end does NOT justify draconian dictatorial means.1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @adactio
@adactio@slightlylate@yoz You're using *much* stronger language than is warranted by any browser's actions, making it hard to respond.2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @tabatkins
@tabatkins@adactio: was about to say the same. Browsers make many product and security decisions which make dev's lives hard. /cc@yoz1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @slightlylate
@slightlylate@tabatkins@yoz I’m not in the least bit worried for devs. I’m worried for everyone else who’s ever wanted to make a website.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@adactio : and for the class of folks that want DNS entries, etc, this is going to come down to tooling.
/cc @tabatkins @yoz
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
& Web Standards TL; Blink API OWNER
Named PWAs w/
DMs open. Tweets my own; press@google.com for official comms.