ES6 class has serious problems. @JasonJay31
-
-
Replying to @_ericelliott
@_ericelliott @JasonJay31 : uh, it has *omissions*. We had to make deep cuts to get consensus. Decorators/traits/etc can all happen quickly2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @slightlylate
@slightlylate @JasonJay31 How about dropping `new`, `extends` and `super`? How likely is that? =)1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @_ericelliott
@_ericelliott @JasonJay31 : you want a different feature (deep object literals)... So no. Profusely not going to happen2 replies 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @slightlylate
@slightlylate @JasonJay31 I want painless refactors from class -> factory, no `new`, easy composition, no child/parent coupling.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @_ericelliott
@_ericelliott @JasonJay31 : you can keep your factories. Classes are functions.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@_ericelliott @JasonJay31 : but we aren't giving return-from-ctor style new syntax in ES6
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
& Web Standards TL; Blink API OWNER
Named PWAs w/
DMs open. Tweets my own; press@google.com for official comms.