Proposal: allow Service Workers to opt-in to controlling requests for service workers (the default would be identical to the current case)
-
-
Replying to @garrettr_2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
-
Replying to @bcrypt
@bcrypt@garrettr_ : so SW inception is a massive usability foot-gun. See AppCache far-future-expires shenanigans.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @slightlylate
@slightlylate@bcrypt Yeah, I get that. The default should not change. But what about giving careful devs the option?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @garrettr_
@garrettr_@bcrypt : to what end? I don't grok when this helps you.4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @slightlylate
@slightlylate@bcrypt Allowing the service worker to update itself lets it control this update cycle, instead of it being "every 24 hrs"1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @garrettr_
@garrettr_@bcrypt : you can control it's update cycle: don't publish any updates = )1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @slightlylate
@slightlylate@bcrypt I see - the service worker will continue running if it cannot be updated? Interesting.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@garrettr_ @bcrypt : Correct. It'd be a pretty crappy UX if your offline thing stopped working just because you happen to be offline ;-)
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
& Web Standards TL; Blink API OWNER
Named PWAs w/
DMs open. Tweets my own; press@google.com for official comms.