@iTorrey sure, but you can state that in the contribution guidelines, and it is already in some licenses, so what is it that needs signing?
-
-
Replying to @mikeal
@mikeal welp,@slightlylate had this to say about it back in the day http://infrequently.org/2008/06/why-do-i-need-to-sign-this/ …3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @slightlylate
@slightlylate@iTorrey ya, i just don’t agree at all. we can come up with all kinds of theoretical “quality” benefits to barriers to entry.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @slightlylate
@slightlylate@iTorrey sure, but that’s the same as saying “these exist,” I am not pretending they don’t exist.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @slightlylate
@slightlylate@iTorrey by “barrier” to adoption I think people mean “lawyers had to be involved” which is true with any *new* CLA as well.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @slightlylate
@slightlylate i’m trying to figure out: what is the legal reason we can’t shove all the CLA assurances in a passive document like a LICENSE?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
-
-
Replying to @slightlylate
@slightlylate@mikeal Asl2 does too. The foundation requires a CLA as extra risk mitigation.0 replies 0 retweets 1 likeThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
& Web Standards TL; Blink API OWNER
Named PWAs w/
DMs open. Tweets my own; press@google.com for official comms.