@addyosmani Fell in love with the idea of element decorators here: http://www.w3.org/TR/components-intro/ …. Problematic to implement I guess?
-
-
Replying to @addyosmani
@addyosmani@grimen all of these things started a sketches. No one invested into fleshing out Decorators. They're ... sketchy.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @dglazkov
@dglazkov@addyosmani@grimen decorator consensus is difficult: some want flamingos, others a koi pond, while a few insist on garden gnomes.1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @csuwildcat
@csuwildcat@dglazkov@addyosmani@grimen decorators walk an interesting line, I am very pro figuring them out (or deciding we can't)1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @briankardell
@briankardell@csuwildcat@addyosmani@grimen I am also pro-solving all problems!!3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @dglazkov
@dglazkov@briankardell@addyosmani@grimen what if we held an open kickoff meeting to get people up to speed and discuss high level issues?3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @cwilso
@cwilso@csuwildcat : the high level issue is that implicit addition/removal of part of an object's identity based on CSS is *INSANE*2 replies 2 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @slightlylate
@slightlylate CSS has many proposals which do "layouts" similar-ish.. they feel related to me. http://discourse.specifiction.org/ ?@cwilso@csuwildcat4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@briankardell : CSS is "safe" from the perspective of JS and DOM specifically *because* it has it's own tree /cc @cwilso @csuwildcat
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
& Web Standards TL; Blink API OWNER
Named PWAs w/
DMs open. Tweets my own; press@google.com for official comms.