Some good points being made in the URL debate, but unfortunately a lot of appeal to "tradition" too.
-
-
-
Replying to @stephenhay
@stephenhay to me, it's a classic UX mistake: "I don't like it, therefore bad for everyone!" a UX benefit DOES exist here, but it's ignored1 reply 1 retweet 2 likes -
Replying to @scottjenson
patrick h. lauke Retweeted patrick h. lauke
@scottjenson@stephenhay and as i said the other day:https://twitter.com/patrick_h_lauke/status/462204442163826688 …patrick h. lauke added,
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @patrick_h_lauke
@patrick_h_lauke@stephenhay the web needs more civil, calm discourse. Too bad not seeing it here. This is an experiment for God's sake2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @scottjenson
@scottjenson There’s plenty of civil discourse happening at http://jakearchibald.com , http://adactio.com , and http://remysharp.com .1 reply 1 retweet 5 likes -
Replying to @scottjenson
@scottjenson That’s ’cause Jake has made the mistake of having comments on his blog. Classic newbie error. Blog-to-blog discourse FTW!2 replies 2 retweets 2 likes
@adactio @jaffathecake @scottjenson : I've come to view fixed locations for discussion without credentialing as the general problem stmt.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
& Web Standards TL; Blink API OWNER
Named PWAs w/
DMs open. Tweets my own; press@google.com for official comms.