"Why You Should Care About Web Components": http://victorsavkin.com/post/78575197096/why-you-should-care-about-web-components … via @victorsavkin
-
-
Replying to @slightlylate
@victorsavkin@slightlylate Any plumbing layer is lossy. There is always a penalty going from one paradigm to another.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @sebmarkbage
@sebmarkbage : not sure I follow. Web components let you expose components at the same fidelity as regular DOM. /cc@victorsavkin1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @slightlylate
@slightlylate Yes but not the same fidelity as other frameworks. As a framework<->framework binding it's lacking.@victorsavkin1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @sebmarkbage
@sebmarkbage : to the extent that frameworks have moved semantics out of DOM, sure..but now you don't have to ;-) /cc@victorsavkin1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @slightlylate
@slightlylate Change tracking systems, functional immutable paradigms, complex object properties, etc. More to the full story.@victorsavkin3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@sebmarkbage : DOM as retained-mode component hierarchy is a good. As data model, less so. Working on that too = ) @victorsavkin
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
& Web Standards TL; Blink API OWNER
Named PWAs w/
DMs open. Tweets my own; press@google.com for official comms.